<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The ideal web 2.0 organisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/07/08/the-ideal-web-20-organisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/07/08/the-ideal-web-20-organisation/</link>
	<description>Simple websites for busy people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sg</title>
		<link>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/07/08/the-ideal-web-20-organisation/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>sg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funnelweb.net/?p=30#comment-16</guid>
		<description>So, after being at M &amp; S for a week now, how web 2.0 friendly do I rate them??

Well, no Instant Messaging (which I found very surprising) BUT widespread support for implementing it - I am now writing the business case for it, working with an architect.

No project wikis but support from both M &amp; S and suppliers for implementing them. That&#039;s good - hopefully I can also try and move that one forward fairly quickly.

Haven&#039;t even looked for blogs, but they are probably less important than wikis for project stuff, I think.

As for self organising, non hierarchical teams, well I hope to be able to form a view on this by the end of the week once I get my teeth into my first project here.

Then I&#039;ll post another follow up. 

All in all, though the IT tools are fairly sketchy (there is way too much reliance on email, IMHO) its great that there is an appetite for addressing this. Hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, after being at M &amp; S for a week now, how web 2.0 friendly do I rate them??</p>
<p>Well, no Instant Messaging (which I found very surprising) BUT widespread support for implementing it &#8211; I am now writing the business case for it, working with an architect.</p>
<p>No project wikis but support from both M &amp; S and suppliers for implementing them. That&#8217;s good &#8211; hopefully I can also try and move that one forward fairly quickly.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t even looked for blogs, but they are probably less important than wikis for project stuff, I think.</p>
<p>As for self organising, non hierarchical teams, well I hope to be able to form a view on this by the end of the week once I get my teeth into my first project here.</p>
<p>Then I&#8217;ll post another follow up. </p>
<p>All in all, though the IT tools are fairly sketchy (there is way too much reliance on email, IMHO) its great that there is an appetite for addressing this. Hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

