<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Funnelweb &#187; browsers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/tag/browsers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funnelweb.net</link>
	<description>Simple websites for busy people</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 08:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Print-only stylesheets and the firefox bug</title>
		<link>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/03/01/print-only-stylesheets-and-the-firefox-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/03/01/print-only-stylesheets-and-the-firefox-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London site rebuild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print-only CSS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funnelweb.net/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the big benefits of using CSS-based design for a site is the fact that you can control the layout of printed pages. Instead of users having to print out exactly what they see on screen, you can get rid of stuff like nav, sidebars and plug-ins from pages, enabling them to print out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big benefits of using CSS-based design for a site is the fact that you can control the layout of printed pages.</p>
<p>Instead of users having to print out exactly what they see on screen, you can get rid of stuff like nav, sidebars and plug-ins from pages, enabling them to print out only say the main content.</p>
<p>Great! So there I was, merrily creating a print-specific stylesheet for my site &#8230;&#8230;. only to find that I then had problems getting the printouts to flow across more than a single page in &#8211; of all things &#8211; Firefox!</p>
<p>Yes, Firefox &#8211; the poster child of open source software -has a print bug in it. Sad to say, it all worked fine in IE6 and IE7.</p>
<p>The details and thankfully the solution are described on  <a title="Fix for the firefox / CSS one page printing bug" href="http://jafferhaider.wordpress.com/2007/12/29/fix-for-the-firefoxcss-one-page-printing-bug/" target="_blank">Jaffer Haider&#8217;s blog</a></p>
<p>The simple answer, it seems, is to add the <strong><span style="color: #800080;">overflow:visible</span></strong> property to any of the div elements you want to appear in your printouts for users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/03/01/print-only-stylesheets-and-the-firefox-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The great CSS v IE6 challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/02/13/the-joys-of-css-and-ie6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/02/13/the-joys-of-css-and-ie6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London site rebuild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IE7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netrenderer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funnelweb.net/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything worked so perfectly (ok, maybe not quite) in IE on my current site but I appreciate the days of table based layouts are limited. Once upon a time, good old tables within tables within tables sprinkled with a few one-pixel gifs was all you ever needed to achieve layout nirvana. Now I struggle night [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything worked so perfectly (ok, maybe not quite) in IE on my current site but I appreciate the days of table based layouts are limited. Once upon a time, good old tables within tables within tables sprinkled with a few one-pixel gifs was all you ever needed to achieve layout nirvana.</p>
<p>Now I struggle night after night with floating div tags, liquid layouts and inline content. Thankfully, the CSS manuals have de-mystified much of it. As has the website, <a title="CSS3.com" href="http://www.css3.com/" target="_blank">www.CSS3.com.</a> And my work colleagues &#8211; again and again.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t make things any easier when Microsoft in their wisdom decide to provide IE7 as standard with Vista. And then advise you to use VMWare if you want to install IE6 on the same computer. Oh, kindly mentioning that its around a 200meg download, too.</p>
<p>Thankfully I was told about <a title="Netrenderer" href="http://ipinfo.info/netrenderer/" target="_blank">netrenderer</a>. An excellent tool for checking page layouts in IE6 without needing to have it installed.</p>
<p>I just didn&#8217;t realise before embarking on CSS-based layout how much of a problem it would be creating styles that worked with IE6. After many wasted hours, I&#8217;ve now abandoned liquid layouts and given up with trying to precisely position content.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;ll try again with version 2 of the re-design&#8230;. one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.funnelweb.net/index.php/2008/02/13/the-joys-of-css-and-ie6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

